qveenkeke1234 qveenkeke1234
  • 02-12-2015
  • History
contestada

why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing historical event

Respuesta :

Goten
Goten Goten
  • 02-12-2015
Because a primary resource would be an interview of someone in that event or their diary or something they wrote about that event. If you couldnt find anything, you would have to use the secondary source, a book or article written about that event but the author wasnt in it or there
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Which country attempted to develop nuclear weapons during the early 2000s? (1 point) Iran China Pakistan Afghanistan
Your salary is $25,000 you just received a 2.5% pay increase for the year. What is your new salary?
The Amount of turkey sold on Saturday is about how many times the amount of turkey sold on Wednesday?
President Carter called this issue "the moral equivalent of war." To what issue was Carter referring?
What part of the compromise of 1850 most angered northerners?
In nature, the fittest animals are the ones that reproduce.
Jordan declares to nick that she "hates careless people." explain the irony here.
The base of the rectangular pyramid shown above has one side that measures 5 inches, one side that measures 12 inches, and diagonals that measure 13 inches. The
1.Which of the following correctly describes a reaction that forms a disaccharide from two monosaccharides? a.Cellulose + fructose → maltose b.Glucose + fruct
In a spreadsheet application, a ____ is identified using letters of the alphabet. A. Cell B. Column C. Row D. Worksheet